Soulful-Derivation
0xe3538d4c5e744e17348c0de030bab203d791a547
Wallet digest
Activity score
83/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$211.67
Total PnL
$-1.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYDeportivo Alavés vs. FC Barcelona: O/U 0.5$212.922d ago
- REDEEMFC Twente '65 vs. FC Volendam: O/U 3.5$23.0832d ago
- TRADEBUYFC Twente '65 vs. FC Volendam: O/U 3.5$11.5434d ago
- REDEEMOlympiacos B.C. vs. Panathinaikos$0.0066d ago
- TRADEBUYOlympiacos B.C. vs. Panathinaikos$10.3368d ago
- REDEEMEthereum Up or Down - February 17, 2AM ET$0.0084d ago
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - February 17, 2AM ET$13.4685d ago
- REDEEMFC Bayern München vs. RU Saint-Gilloise: O/U 4.5$21.94111d ago
- TRADEBUYFC Bayern München vs. RU Saint-Gilloise: O/U 4.5$14.26112d ago
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - December 16, 10:15PM-10:30PM ET$28.08146d ago
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - December 16, 10:15PM-10:30PM ET$14.12147d ago
- TRADESELLWill Gavin Newsom win the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination?$13.21188d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Gavin Newsom win the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination?$13.55188d ago
- TRADESELLWill Gavin Newsom win the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination?$39.44205d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Gavin Newsom win the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination?$40.17205d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 10
- Avg trade size
- $38.30
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 205d ago
- Last active
- 2d ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".
