Pesky-Settlement
0xeda453d279f2d641a05885d1ffb0ccb1ff7ad5db
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
30
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-2.3K
Realised
$58.87
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 30- YES
Zama FDV above $400M one day after launch?
1705 shares @ 0.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$0.00
$-5.12
- OVER
FC Internazionale Milano vs. FK Bodø/Glimt: O/U 3.5
700 shares @ 57.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 24, 2026$0.00
$-399.00
- YES
Will Racing Club de Lens win on 2026-02-21?
670 shares @ 30.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 21, 2026$0.00
$-201.44
- OVER
Racing Club de Lens vs. FC Metz: O/U 3.5
467 shares @ 71.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 8, 2026$0.00
$-332.44
- NO
Will CA Osasuna win on 2026-02-21?
400 shares @ 44.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 21, 2026$0.00
$-176.00
- YES
Will Olympique Lyonnais win on 2026-02-22?
400 shares @ 6.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 22, 2026$0.00
$-25.20
- OVER
Arsenal FC vs. Wigan Athletic FC: O/U 4.5
375 shares @ 88.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 15, 2026$0.00
$-333.24
- YES
Will Sunderland AFC vs. Liverpool FC end in a draw?
200 shares @ 17.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 11, 2026$0.00
$-34.00
- NO
Will Newcastle United FC win on 2026-02-14?
200 shares @ 62.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 14, 2026$0.00
$-124.00
- YES
Will Paris Saint-Germain FC win on 2026-02-25?
145 shares @ 76.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 25, 2026$0.00
$-110.08
Recent activity
- TRADESELLOpensea FDV above $1B one day after launch?$12.31Mar 23, 20:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYRacing Club de Lens vs. FC Metz: O/U 3.5$0.24Mar 8, 15:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYRacing Club de Lens vs. FC Metz: O/U 3.5$27.03Mar 8, 15:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYRacing Club de Lens vs. FC Metz: O/U 3.5$1.76Mar 8, 15:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYRacing Club de Lens vs. FC Metz: O/U 3.5$0.74Mar 8, 15:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYRacing Club de Lens vs. FC Metz: O/U 3.5$302.66Mar 8, 15:19 UTC
- TRADESELLSpread: Racing Club de Lens (-1.5)$332.43Mar 8, 15:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Racing Club de Lens (-1.5)$0.50Mar 8, 14:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Racing Club de Lens (-1.5)$35.64Mar 8, 14:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Racing Club de Lens (-1.5)$43.74Mar 8, 14:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Racing Club de Lens (-1.5)$117.39Mar 8, 14:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Paris Saint-Germain FC win on 2026-02-25?$110.08Feb 25, 19:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYFC Internazionale Milano vs. FK Bodø/Glimt: O/U 3.5$399.00Feb 24, 19:51 UTC
- TRADESELLClub Atlético de Madrid vs. Club Brugge KV: O/U 4.5$45.06Feb 24, 19:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYClub Atlético de Madrid vs. Club Brugge KV: O/U 4.5$9.90Feb 24, 19:28 UTC
- TRADESELLClub Atlético de Madrid vs. Club Brugge KV: O/U 4.5$1.18Feb 24, 19:27 UTC
- TRADESELLClub Atlético de Madrid vs. Club Brugge KV: O/U 4.5$7.59Feb 24, 19:26 UTC
- TRADESELLClub Atlético de Madrid vs. Club Brugge KV: O/U 4.5$43.00Feb 24, 19:26 UTC
- TRADESELLClub Atlético de Madrid vs. Club Brugge KV: O/U 4.5$6.08Feb 24, 19:26 UTC
- TRADESELLClub Atlético de Madrid vs. Club Brugge KV: O/U 4.5$2.03Feb 24, 19:26 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 49
- Avg trade size
- $72.62
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 21, 17:35 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 23, 20:59 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 2 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".