Familiar-Yurt
0xef3ef4dd2f1e43569818f72fe6ec0476bf779e72
Activity score
52/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
5
Open notional
$4.65
Total PnL
$-8.01
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- NO
Exact Score: Arsenal FC 3 - 1 Club Atlético de Madrid?
5 shares @ 97.0¢·now 93.0¢·exp May 5, 2026$4.65
$-0.20
- YES
Exact Score: Nottingham Forest FC 0 - 2 Aston Villa FC?
49 shares @ 5.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 30, 2026$0.00
$-2.47
- YES
Exact Score: Nottingham Forest FC 2 - 0 Aston Villa FC?
32 shares @ 5.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 30, 2026$0.00
$-1.59
- YES
Exact Score: Nottingham Forest FC 0 - 1 Aston Villa FC?
30 shares @ 9.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 30, 2026$0.00
$-2.68
- YES
Exact Score: Nottingham Forest FC 0 - 0 Aston Villa FC?
27 shares @ 4.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 30, 2026$0.00
$-1.07
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Nottingham Forest FC 0 - 1 Aston Villa FC?$2.232d ago
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Nottingham Forest FC 2 - 0 Aston Villa FC?$1.592d ago
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Nottingham Forest FC 0 - 0 Aston Villa FC?$1.072d ago
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Nottingham Forest FC 0 - 2 Aston Villa FC?$2.372d ago
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Nottingham Forest FC 3 - 2 Aston Villa FC?$0.002d ago
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Nottingham Forest FC 0 - 1 Aston Villa FC?$0.452d ago
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Arsenal FC 3 - 1 Club Atlético de Madrid?$4.852d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 7
- Avg trade size
- $1.79
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 2d ago
- Last active
- 2d ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".