Imaginary-Energy
0xfb874bdd878fd7b81b7812e178f75765a1f83ede
Wallet digest
Activity score
44/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-2.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin reach $130,000 by December 31, 2025?$0.82Nov 17, 03:10 UTC
- TRADESELLWill any Google Gemini 3 model score at least 1500 on LMArena by December 31?$3.98Nov 17, 03:10 UTC
- TRADESELLWill North and South Korea engage in direct talks by June 30?$21.55Nov 17, 03:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill North and South Korea engage in direct talks by June 30?$20.00Nov 7, 07:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill any Google Gemini 3 model score at least 1500 on LMArena by December 31?$3.00Nov 7, 06:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYNorth Korea missile launch by November 15?$2.00Nov 7, 06:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $130,000 by December 31, 2025?$2.00Nov 7, 06:06 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 7
- Avg trade size
- $7.62
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Nov 7, 06:06 UTC
- Last active
- Nov 17, 03:10 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".