Honorable-Theism
0xfe16650787eb9420b2c8e6103a0f438add4eb1ba
Wallet digest
Activity score
84/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
5
Open notional
$94.30
Total PnL
$36.28
Realised
$53.95
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Will Ronaldo Caiado win the 2026 Brazilian presidential election?
2500 shares @ 2.0¢·now 2.1¢·exp Oct 4, 2026$53.50
$3.50
- YES
Will Enrique Riquelme win the 2026 Real Madrid presidential election?
265 shares @ 10.0¢·now 6.5¢·exp Jun 8, 2026$17.22
$-9.27
- YES
Will Michelle Bolsonaro win the 2026 Brazilian presidential election?
2672 shares @ 0.7¢·now 0.5¢·exp Oct 4, 2026$14.70
$-3.66
- YES
Will Ivan Cepeda Castro win the 2026 Colombian presidential election?
48 shares @ 27.3¢·now 18.5¢·exp Jun 21, 2026$8.88
$-4.24
- YES
Will Club Brugge win the 2025–26 Champions League?
1000 shares @ 0.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 31, 2026$0.00
$-4.00
Recent activity
No activity on record.
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 0
- Avg trade size
- $0.00
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- —
- Last active
- —
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".