Surprised-Access
0x0a1643fb009dacac932036a03b890ab533459d73
Wallet digest
Activity score
89/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
43
Open notional
$3.6K
Total PnL
$-67.76
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 43- UNDER
Al Fateh Saudi Club vs. Al Najmah Saudi Club: O/U 2.5
810 shares @ 30.8¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 14, 2026$809.66
$560.55
- OVER
Aston Villa FC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 2.5
762 shares @ 59.5¢·now 59.5¢·exp May 17, 2026$453.65
$0.00
- OVER
Al Ettifaq Saudi Club vs. Al Ittihad Saudi Club: O/U 1.5
449 shares @ 81.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 14, 2026$448.96
$85.12
- OVER
Valencia CF vs. Rayo Vallecano de Madrid: O/U 1.5
252 shares @ 72.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 14, 2026$251.56
$70.35
- UNDER
Real Madrid CF vs. Real Oviedo: O/U 1.5
1190 shares @ 15.8¢·now 18.5¢·exp May 14, 2026$220.16
$32.60
- YES
Girona FC vs. Real Sociedad de Fútbol: Both Teams to Score
197 shares @ 58.7¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 14, 2026$197.30
$81.47
- UNDER
Valencia CF vs. Rayo Vallecano de Madrid: O/U 2.5
188 shares @ 56.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 14, 2026$188.35
$82.90
- AL QADISIYAH SAUDI CLUB
Spread: Al Qadisiyah Saudi Club (-1.5)
149 shares @ 58.5¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 14, 2026$148.72
$61.71
- LUIS GURULE
UFC Fight Night: Daniel Barez vs. Luis Gurule (Flyweight, Prelims)
250 shares @ 58.2¢·now 57.5¢·exp May 17, 2026$143.63
$-1.77
- UNDER
Al Qadisiyah Saudi Club vs. Al Hazem SC: O/U 2.5
131 shares @ 25.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 14, 2026$130.86
$98.13
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYUFC Fight Night: Daniel Barez vs. Luis Gurule (Flyweight, Prelims)$3.66May 14, 20:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYAdelaide United FC vs. Auckland FC: Both Teams to Score$12.72May 14, 20:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYAston Villa FC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 2.5$117.07May 14, 20:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYAston Villa FC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 2.5$112.87May 14, 20:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYAston Villa FC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 2.5$233.76May 14, 20:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Al Ittihad Saudi Club (-1.5)$30.41May 14, 17:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Real Madrid CF (-1.5)$8.81May 14, 17:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Real Madrid CF (-1.5)$9.67May 14, 17:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYReal Madrid CF vs. Real Oviedo: Both Teams to Score$10.28May 14, 17:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYUFC Fight Night: Daniel Barez vs. Luis Gurule (Flyweight, Prelims)$3.33May 14, 17:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYReal Madrid CF vs. Real Oviedo: Both Teams to Score$2.45May 14, 17:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Qadisiyah Saudi Club vs. Al Hazem SC: Both Teams to Score$3.41May 14, 17:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Qadisiyah Saudi Club vs. Al Hazem SC: Both Teams to Score$2.76May 14, 17:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Qadisiyah Saudi Club vs. Al Hazem SC: Both Teams to Score$0.90May 14, 17:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Qadisiyah Saudi Club vs. Al Hazem SC: O/U 1.5$2.26May 14, 17:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Qadisiyah Saudi Club vs. Al Hazem SC: O/U 1.5$1.58May 14, 17:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Qadisiyah Saudi Club vs. Al Hazem SC: O/U 2.5$3.71May 14, 17:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Qadisiyah Saudi Club vs. Al Hazem SC: O/U 2.5$1.26May 14, 17:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Qadisiyah Saudi Club vs. Al Hazem SC: O/U 2.5$9.81May 14, 17:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Qadisiyah Saudi Club vs. Al Hazem SC: O/U 2.5$0.33May 14, 17:16 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $15.96
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 14, 17:02 UTC
- Last active
- May 14, 20:48 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".