Ragged-Knickers
0x0f36b6822656152a85d3d9db0f87c22649f0d9eb
Wallet digest
Activity score
62/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$5.65
Total PnL
$-0.35
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill Romania be in the top 10 at Eurovision 2026?$194.44May 17, 14:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Democratic Union of Hungarians in Romania (UDMR) be included in the next Romanian government?$6.01May 13, 14:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Romania be in the top 10 at Eurovision 2026?$141.96May 13, 14:39 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Our Homeland Movement (Mi Hazánk) win at least one seat in the next Hungarian parliamentary election?$147.73Apr 12, 20:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Our Homeland Movement (Mi Hazánk) win at least one seat in the next Hungarian parliamentary election?$86.00Apr 12, 17:20 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 4
- Avg trade size
- $95.43
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 12, 17:20 UTC
- Last active
- May 17, 14:12 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".