Female-Peacoat
0x0fb4fd29ec2c37c218b66cf44dd363d7dac92c09
Wallet digest
Activity score
59/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
17
Open notional
$6.72
Total PnL
$-17.28
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 17- YES
Will Arsenal FC vs. Burnley FC end in a draw?
25 shares @ 8.0¢·now 7.5¢·exp May 18, 2026$1.88
$-0.13
- YES
Will Burnley FC win on 2026-05-18?
34 shares @ 2.9¢·now 3.1¢·exp May 18, 2026$1.07
$0.07
- YES
Will Real Madrid CF vs. Athletic Club end in a draw?
6 shares @ 18.0¢·now 18.5¢·exp May 23, 2026$1.03
$0.03
- YES
Will Crystal Palace FC vs. Arsenal FC end in a draw?
5 shares @ 19.0¢·now 19.5¢·exp May 24, 2026$1.03
$0.03
- YES
Will Wuhan San Zhen FC win on 2026-05-20?
6 shares @ 16.0¢·now 15.5¢·exp May 20, 2026$0.97
$-0.03
- YES
Will Athletic Club win on 2026-05-23?
5 shares @ 19.2¢·now 14.5¢·exp May 23, 2026$0.75
$-0.25
- YES
Will Hellas Verona FC win on 2026-05-17?
20 shares @ 9.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-2.00
- YES
Will RC Celta de Vigo win on 2026-05-17?
20 shares @ 5.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will Samsunspor vs. Göztepe SK end in a draw?
19 shares @ 27.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 16, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- YES
Will Parma Calcio 1913 win on 2026-05-17?
14 shares @ 7.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
Recent activity
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 18, 2:05AM-2:10AM ET$0.00May 18, 06:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - May 18, 2:05AM-2:10AM ET$5.35May 18, 06:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Madrid CF vs. Athletic Club end in a draw?$1.02May 18, 06:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Wuhan San Zhen FC win on 2026-05-20?$1.03May 18, 06:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Burnley FC win on 2026-05-18?$1.03May 18, 01:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Arsenal FC vs. Burnley FC end in a draw?$2.06May 18, 01:07 UTC
- TRADESELLWill AJ Auxerre win on 2026-05-17?$7.68May 18, 01:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill RC Celta de Vigo win on 2026-05-17?$1.03May 17, 18:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Crystal Palace FC vs. Arsenal FC end in a draw?$1.02May 17, 16:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Athletic Club win on 2026-05-23?$1.02May 17, 16:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Portland Timbers win on 2026-05-17?$1.03May 17, 16:38 UTC
- TRADESELLBitcoin Up or Down - May 17, 12:30PM-12:35PM ET$7.34May 17, 16:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - May 17, 12:30PM-12:35PM ET$5.11May 17, 16:34 UTC
- TRADESELLWill FC Internazionale Milano vs. Hellas Verona FC end in a draw?$5.54May 17, 16:33 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 17, 8:20AM-8:25AM ET$0.00May 17, 12:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - May 17, 8:20AM-8:25AM ET$5.35May 17, 12:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Metz win on 2026-05-17?$1.03May 17, 12:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill AJ Auxerre win on 2026-05-17?$1.03May 17, 12:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hellas Verona FC win on 2026-05-17?$1.03May 17, 12:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Internazionale Milano vs. Hellas Verona FC end in a draw?$1.02May 17, 12:13 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 28
- Avg trade size
- $2.68
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 16, 18:33 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 06:12 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".