Grandiose-Transition
0x24231902f60828cbd0fdde3a75cc67c1851be8d8
Activity score
68/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$4.47
Total PnL
$-0.13
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYOilers vs. Ducks: O/U 4.5$4.627h ago
- REDEEMWild vs. Stars: O/U 6.5$4.942d ago
- TRADEBUYWild vs. Stars: O/U 6.5$1.022d ago
- TRADEBUYWild vs. Stars: O/U 6.5$1.022d ago
- REDEEMMiami Marlins vs. Los Angeles Dodgers$4.893d ago
- REDEEMMiami Marlins vs. Los Angeles Dodgers: O/U 8.5$5.033d ago
- TRADEBUYMiami Marlins vs. Los Angeles Dodgers$1.203d ago
- TRADEBUYWild vs. Stars: O/U 6.5$3.003d ago
- TRADEBUYMiami Marlins vs. Los Angeles Dodgers: O/U 8.5$2.403d ago
- TRADESELLSpread: Chicago Cubs (-1.5)$2.013d ago
- TRADESELLMiami Marlins vs. Los Angeles Dodgers: O/U 8.5$2.263d ago
- TRADESELLChicago Cubs vs. San Diego Padres$6.263d ago
- TRADEBUYMiami Marlins vs. Los Angeles Dodgers: O/U 8.5$2.153d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: Chicago Cubs (-1.5)$2.253d ago
- TRADEBUYChicago Cubs vs. San Diego Padres$2.903d ago
- TRADEBUYChicago Cubs vs. San Diego Padres$3.353d ago
- REDEEMOilers vs. Ducks$0.003d ago
- TRADEBUYOilers vs. Ducks$3.454d ago
- REDEEMPhiladelphia Phillies vs. Atlanta Braves$5.284d ago
- REDEEMColorado Rockies vs. New York Mets$9.244d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 16
- Avg trade size
- $2.71
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 5d ago
- Last active
- 7h ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".