Unwritten-Shock
0x35c8700bdf3529179d4692b2b7ddb92fe45990cb
Wallet digest
Activity score
75/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
69
Open notional
$3.8K
Total PnL
$-33.6K
Realised
$-753.73
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 69- NO
Will FC Lorient win on 2026-05-17?
2500 shares @ 59.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$2.5K
$1.0K
- ALEX DE MINAUR
Hamburg European Open: Francisco Cerundolo vs Alex de Minaur
854 shares @ 37.7¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 25, 2026$853.90
$531.90
- NO
Will Lille OSC win on 2026-05-17?
282 shares @ 32.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$282.19
$191.89
- MIOMIR KECMANOVIC
Hamburg European Open: Miomir Kecmanovic vs Karen Khachanov
419 shares @ 43.0¢·now 41.5¢·exp May 25, 2026$173.72
$-6.28
- WIZARDS
Wizards vs. Trail Blazers
9854 shares @ 9.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 29, 2026$0.00
$-974.90
- WIZARDS
76ers vs. Wizards
9422 shares @ 10.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 1, 2026$0.00
$-1.0K
- NO
Will Germany win on 2026-03-30?
5981 shares @ 19.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 30, 2026$0.00
$-1.1K
- NO
Will Paris Saint-Germain FC win on 2026-04-03?
5494 shares @ 24.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 3, 2026$0.00
$-1.3K
- NO
Will Arsenal FC win on 2026-05-05?
5385 shares @ 39.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 5, 2026$0.00
$-2.1K
- NO
Will Arsenal FC win on 2026-05-10?
4874 shares @ 38.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 10, 2026$0.00
$-1.9K
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill Brighton & Hove Albion FC win on 2026-05-17?$2.1KMay 17, 21:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYHamburg European Open: Miomir Kecmanovic vs Karen Khachanov$183.08May 17, 21:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYHamburg European Open: Francisco Cerundolo vs Alex de Minaur$97.81May 17, 19:39 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Olympique de Marseille win on 2026-05-17?$119.53May 17, 19:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Lorient win on 2026-05-17?$5.06May 17, 18:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Lorient win on 2026-05-17?$1.5KMay 17, 18:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Cagliari Calcio win on 2026-05-17?$1.3KMay 17, 18:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYHamburg European Open: Francisco Cerundolo vs Alex de Minaur$230.20May 17, 18:09 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Newcastle United FC win on 2026-05-17?$598.80May 17, 16:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Lille OSC win on 2026-05-17?$2.35May 17, 12:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Lille OSC win on 2026-05-17?$89.80May 17, 12:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Newcastle United FC win on 2026-05-17?$13.68May 17, 12:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Newcastle United FC win on 2026-05-17?$2.6KMay 17, 12:08 UTC
- TRADESELLWill AC Milan win on 2026-05-17?$218.04May 17, 11:53 UTC
- TRADESELLWill AC Milan win on 2026-05-17?$14.14May 17, 11:51 UTC
- REDEEMWill FC Augsburg win on 2026-05-16?$2.5KMay 17, 05:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Brighton & Hove Albion FC win on 2026-05-17?$1.1KMay 16, 19:12 UTC
- TRADESELLWill VfB Stuttgart win on 2026-05-16?$91.42May 16, 14:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Olympique de Marseille win on 2026-05-17?$2.65May 15, 22:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Olympique de Marseille win on 2026-05-17?$441.26May 15, 22:51 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 44
- Avg trade size
- $601.52
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 8, 16:06 UTC
- Last active
- May 17, 21:09 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 2 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".