Vengeful-Oxford
0x4bfc65e32ad2be86bdd3cf74a00ad1b49eaece53
Activity score
75/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
10
Open notional
$4.3K
Total PnL
$-7.5K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- VICI GAMING
Dota 2: Team Resilience vs Vici Gaming - Game 3 Winner
2734 shares @ 63.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 3, 2026$2.7K
$1.0K
- TEAM RESILIENCE
Dota 2: Team Resilience vs Vici Gaming (BO5) - ACL X ESL Challenger China Playoffs
7332 shares @ 45.2¢·now 21.5¢·exp May 3, 2026$1.6K
$-1.7K
- TEAM RESILIENCE
Dota 2: Team Resilience vs Vici Gaming - Game 2 Winner
3000 shares @ 58.0¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 3, 2026$1.50
$-1.7K
- YES
Will Club Atlético de Madrid win on 2026-04-29?
3000 shares @ 31.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 29, 2026$0.00
$-930.00
- XTREME GAMING
Dota 2: Xtreme Gaming vs Vici Gaming (BO3) - ACL X ESL Challenger China Playoffs
2000 shares @ 78.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 3, 2026$0.00
$-1.6K
- YAKULT BROTHERS
Dota 2: Vici Gaming vs Yakult Brothers (BO3) - ACL X ESL Challenger China Playoffs
1200 shares @ 47.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$0.00
$-564.00
- THUNDERTALK GAMING
LoL: ThunderTalk Gaming vs LGD Gaming (BO3) - LPL Group Nirvana
1000 shares @ 45.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 30, 2026$0.00
$-450.00
- YES
Will Paris Saint-Germain FC win on 2026-05-02?
1000 shares @ 62.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$0.00
$-620.00
- OVER
FC Andorra vs. Albacete Balompié: O/U 1.5
1000 shares @ 38.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 1, 2026$0.00
$-380.00
- OVER
FC Andorra vs. Albacete Balompié: O/U 2.5
1000 shares @ 53.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 1, 2026$0.00
$-529.99
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Team Resilience vs Vici Gaming - Game 3 Winner$1.2K32m ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Team Resilience vs Vici Gaming - Game 3 Winner$374.8933m ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Team Resilience vs Vici Gaming - Game 3 Winner$17.0354m ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Team Resilience vs Vici Gaming - Game 3 Winner$47.3454m ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Team Resilience vs Vici Gaming - Game 3 Winner$3.151h ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Team Resilience vs Vici Gaming - Game 3 Winner$57.961h ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Team Resilience vs Vici Gaming - Game 3 Winner$71.821h ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Team Resilience vs Vici Gaming - Game 2 Winner$1.7K2h ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Team Resilience vs Vici Gaming (BO5) - ACL X ESL Challenger China Playoffs$368.004h ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Team Resilience vs Vici Gaming (BO5) - ACL X ESL Challenger China Playoffs$225.984h ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Team Resilience vs Vici Gaming (BO5) - ACL X ESL Challenger China Playoffs$0.854h ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Team Resilience vs Vici Gaming (BO5) - ACL X ESL Challenger China Playoffs$0.854h ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Team Resilience vs Vici Gaming (BO5) - ACL X ESL Challenger China Playoffs$42.594h ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Team Resilience vs Vici Gaming (BO5) - ACL X ESL Challenger China Playoffs$99.304h ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Team Resilience vs Vici Gaming (BO5) - ACL X ESL Challenger China Playoffs$779.494h ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Team Resilience vs Vici Gaming (BO5) - ACL X ESL Challenger China Playoffs$33.414h ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Team Resilience vs Vici Gaming (BO5) - ACL X ESL Challenger China Playoffs$40.504h ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Team Resilience vs Vici Gaming (BO5) - ACL X ESL Challenger China Playoffs$818.184h ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Team Resilience vs Vici Gaming (BO5) - ACL X ESL Challenger China Playoffs$7.904h ago
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Team Resilience vs Vici Gaming (BO5) - ACL X ESL Challenger China Playoffs$900.004h ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 45
- Avg trade size
- $221.24
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 22h ago
- Last active
- 32m ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".