Violet-Segment
0x4f72d05a005f239725eb2497ee22b0f40c6e230a
Wallet digest
Activity score
66/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
27
Open notional
$40.17
Total PnL
$-1.0K
Realised
$68.40
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 27- YES
Will Bitcoin dip to $75,000 on May 17?
4229 shares @ 2.2¢·now 0.9¢·exp May 18, 2026$40.17
$-51.81
- YES
Will the price of Ethereum be above $2,400 on February 8?
4535 shares @ 0.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 8, 2026$0.00
$-9.07
- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be above $82,000 on May 16?
3671 shares @ 2.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 16, 2026$0.00
$-73.41
- NO
Will the price of Bitcoin be above $64,000 on February 18?
3309 shares @ 3.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 18, 2026$0.00
$-115.46
- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be above $80,000 on May 16?
1780 shares @ 2.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 16, 2026$0.00
$-46.44
- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be above $86,000 on January 31?
1250 shares @ 4.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2026$0.00
$-50.00
- YES
Will Hyperliquid reach $48 in March?
1182 shares @ 6.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 1, 2026$0.00
$-73.38
- YES
Will Bitcoin reach $79,000 on April 14?
786 shares @ 1.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 15, 2026$0.00
$-10.22
- NO
Will the price of Bitcoin be above $64,000 on February 19?
778 shares @ 5.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 19, 2026$0.00
$-43.35
- YES
Will the price of Bitcoin be above $82,000 on February 3?
773 shares @ 7.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 3, 2026$0.00
$-57.03
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin dip to $75,000 on May 17?$98.28May 17, 12:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be above $80,000 on May 16?$49.61May 16, 11:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be above $82,000 on May 16?$78.45May 15, 17:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $80,000 on April 14?$10.16Apr 14, 16:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $77,000 on April 14?$15.00Apr 14, 13:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be above $76,000 on April 14?$15.00Apr 14, 13:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Bitcoin reach $79,000 on April 14?$11.00Apr 14, 13:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hyperliquid reach $48 in March?$3.00Mar 24, 12:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hyperliquid reach $52 in March?$0.25Mar 24, 12:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hyperliquid reach $52 in March?$1.00Mar 24, 12:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hyperliquid reach $52 in March?$1.00Mar 24, 11:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hyperliquid reach $52 in March?$1.00Mar 24, 11:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hyperliquid reach $48 in March?$52.00Mar 24, 11:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hyperliquid reach $48 in March?$18.38Mar 24, 11:16 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Hyperliquid reach $48 in March?$47.17Mar 20, 17:17 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Hyperliquid reach $52 in March?$124.24Mar 20, 17:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hyperliquid reach $52 in March?$82.73Mar 9, 13:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hyperliquid reach $48 in March?$10.00Mar 9, 13:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hyperliquid reach $48 in March?$10.00Mar 9, 13:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Hyperliquid reach $48 in March?$0.28Mar 9, 13:39 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $30.00
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 6, 11:17 UTC
- Last active
- May 17, 12:00 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 2 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".