0x6e31a8084c9cbf27cc0829b9be43c266fe90da7f
0x6e31a8084c9cbf27cc0829b9be43c266fe90da7f
Activity score
77/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$631.14
Total PnL
$-138.04
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Cameron Young win the 2026 Truist Championship?$384.811h ago
- REDEEMSpread: Knicks (-6.5)$0.007h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Justin Thomas win the 2026 Truist Championship?$403.547h ago
- REDEEMToronto Blue Jays vs. Minnesota Twins$0.003d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: Knicks (-6.5)$802.453d ago
- TRADESELLSpread: Pistons (-8.5)$1.6K6d ago
- REDEEMHouston Astros vs. Boston Red Sox$0.006d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: Pistons (-8.5)$882.016d ago
- TRADEBUYToronto Blue Jays vs. Minnesota Twins$403.856d ago
- TRADEBUYHouston Astros vs. Boston Red Sox$403.257d ago
- TRADESELLBaltimore Orioles vs. New York Yankees$611.077d ago
- TRADEBUYBaltimore Orioles vs. New York Yankees$402.667d ago
- TRADESELLKnicks vs. Hawks$919.469d ago
- TRADEBUYKnicks vs. Hawks$581.889d ago
- REDEEMSpread: Cavaliers (-9.5)$1.2K9d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: Cavaliers (-9.5)$574.6410d ago
- REDEEMPistons vs. Magic$0.0010d ago
- REDEEMSpread: Spurs (-4.5)$0.0010d ago
- TRADEBUYPistons vs. Magic$571.7612d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: Spurs (-4.5)$398.0013d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 28
- Avg trade size
- $487.35
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 26d ago
- Last active
- 1h ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".
