Impeccable-Website
0x87bbff9a6e0f8c2160e78296450d220b690d42b0
Activity score
70/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$96.82
Total PnL
$-34.86
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYSeattle Storm vs. Connecticut Sun$133.702h ago
- TRADESELLWest Ham United FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$133.272h ago
- TRADEBUYWest Ham United FC vs. Arsenal FC: O/U 2.5$299.753h ago
- REDEEMFight to Go the Distance?$0.003h ago
- REDEEMThunder vs. Lakers$0.003h ago
- REDEEMO/U 2.5 Rounds$0.003h ago
- TRADESELLWill Burnley FC vs. Aston Villa FC end in a draw?$300.103h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Burnley FC vs. Aston Villa FC end in a draw?$100.245h ago
- TRADESELLWill Aston Villa FC win on 2026-05-10?$100.375h ago
- REDEEMMinnesota Twins vs. Cleveland Guardians$0.005h ago
- REDEEMMinnesota Twins vs. Cleveland Guardians$0.005h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Aston Villa FC win on 2026-05-10?$176.795h ago
- REDEEMMinnesota Twins vs. Cleveland Guardians$176.745h ago
- TRADEBUYO/U 2.5 Rounds$100.5716h ago
- TRADEBUYThunder vs. Lakers$10.2616h ago
- TRADESELLUFC 328: Joaquin Buckley vs. Sean Brady (Welterweight, Main Card)$110.5216h ago
- TRADEBUYMinnesota Twins vs. Cleveland Guardians$77.3016h ago
- TRADESELLAvalanche vs. Wild$45.4016h ago
- TRADESELLSpread: Thunder (-9.5)$30.8516h ago
- TRADEBUYAvalanche vs. Wild$101.3217h ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 39
- Avg trade size
- $134.05
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 3d ago
- Last active
- 2h ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".
