Homely-Suitcase
0xa19ed2e2b3379b0bceb68443510293dc8798fcf9
Activity score
94/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
4
Open notional
$92.58
Total PnL
$23.58
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YES
US x Iran permanent peace deal by May 15, 2026?
312 shares @ 9.9¢·now 17.9¢·exp May 15, 2026$55.94
$24.94
- YES
Strait of Hormuz traffic returns to normal by end of May?
101 shares @ 26.6¢·now 27.5¢·exp May 31, 2026$27.88
$0.88
- YES
Will Trump say "Strait" or "Hormuz" during events with Xi Jinping?
9 shares @ 69.0¢·now 61.5¢·exp May 15, 2026$5.35
$-0.65
- YES
Will Donald Trump post 80-99 Truth Social posts from May 8 to May 15, 2026?
37 shares @ 13.6¢·now 9.3¢·exp May 15, 2026$3.41
$-1.59
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYUS x Iran permanent peace deal by May 15, 2026?$7.003d ago
- TRADEBUYStrait of Hormuz traffic returns to normal by end of May?$20.003d ago
- TRADEBUYUS x Iran permanent peace deal by May 15, 2026?$20.003d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Trump say "Strait" or "Hormuz" during events with Xi Jinping?$6.073d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Donald Trump post 80-99 Truth Social posts from May 8 to May 15, 2026?$5.223d ago
- TRADEBUYStrait of Hormuz traffic returns to normal by end of May?$7.003d ago
- TRADEBUYUS x Iran permanent peace deal by May 15, 2026?$4.003d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 7
- Avg trade size
- $9.90
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 3d ago
- Last active
- 3d ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".
