Neat-Resale
0xa5e0aa316d3bf2f0eb08c4b3462409d3e6d19578
Activity score
84/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$204.75
Total PnL
$2.05
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYExact Score: SC Freiburg 3 - 3 SC Braga?$202.769h ago
- REDEEMWill Trump say "Greenland" during events with Rutte?$0.0028d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Trump say "Greenland" during events with Rutte?$17.3931d ago
- REDEEMACF Fiorentina vs. RKS Raków Częstochowa: O/U 2.5$0.0052d ago
- TRADEBUYACF Fiorentina vs. RKS Raków Częstochowa: O/U 2.5$13.8957d ago
- REDEEMSpread: Real Madrid CF (-1.5)$22.4388d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: Real Madrid CF (-1.5)$8.3088d ago
- REDEEMBeşiktaş JK vs. Kayserispor: O/U 3.5$0.00107d ago
- TRADEBUYBeşiktaş JK vs. Kayserispor: O/U 3.5$9.85108d ago
- REDEEMWill JD Vance say "Radical Left" at AmericaFest events on December 21?$0.00137d ago
- TRADEBUYWill JD Vance say "Radical Left" at AmericaFest events on December 21?$4.94138d ago
- TRADESELLWill Arsenal win the 2025–26 English Premier League?$14.72181d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Arsenal win the 2025–26 English Premier League?$15.14181d ago
- TRADESELLWill Oscar Piastri be the 2025 Drivers Champion?$21.28198d ago
- TRADEBUYWill Oscar Piastri be the 2025 Drivers Champion?$21.55198d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 10
- Avg trade size
- $32.98
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 198d ago
- Last active
- 9h ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".
