UnclassifiedExpires Jul 11, 2026
Creator

South Sudan vs. Cape Verde

Probability

100¢

1h

+0.3pp

24h

+7.4pp

24h Vol

$22.6K

Liquidity

$71.0K

Research loop

Inspect detail

Read the move, holders, recent trades, source, and resolution risk before saving anything.

Canonical status

confidence: high

Source status (Polymarket)

active · uma=proposed

Derived status (Orrery)

UMA PENDING

Reason

Upstream UMA resolution status is 'proposed'.

Resolution is awaiting UMA confirmation. Price may move sharply when it settles.

Methodology explanation

Review-only opportunity

No paper intent is emitted from the public opportunity row. Paper action appears only after the paper governor evaluates the row.

read_only_explanationpaper-onlysend false

Why this market is in review

signal

Momentum / follow-through

65% source confidence on this opportunity row.

Paper-only action

paper-only

Review-only opportunity

read_only_explanation; no live order, no network send, no raw secrets.

Risk / veto readback

review

Resolution review required

The public opportunity row has not passed the paper governor; source wording and settlement state remain review blockers.

Source evidence

source

4 mapped surfaces

283/283 sources runtime-backed; all registered sources are runtime-backed; live authority remains false.

Signals

  • Momentum / follow-throughclear

    65% source confidence on this opportunity row.

  • Resolution-source riskwatch

    30% source confidence on this opportunity row.

Veto / blockers

  • Resolution review requiredwatch

    The public opportunity row has not passed the paper governor; source wording and settlement state remain review blockers.

Costs / sizing

Research score
Composite opportunity score before paper-governor costs and vetoes.
47
Capacity
Estimated research capacity, not an approved size.
$6k
Liquidity
Market liquidity visible on the opportunity row.
$71k
Explanation packet2026-06-16.1
DecisionSignalsVetoes and capsCostsDriftShadow policyLearning statusAuthority
What can be learned
Source-to-runtime coverage283/283 runtime-backed0 unmapped

all registered sources are runtime-backed; live authority remains false; this card cites mapped surfaces only.

P32-Source-to-Runtime-Coverage-Matrix-v1microstructure_quality_kernelexecution_markout_kernelsemantic_risk_kernel+3
live falsesecrets falsetraining falsenot advice

Resolution & Risk

MEDIUM risk
End date
Jul 11, 2026
UMA status
proposed
Resolution source
Primary
based on the final score including any overtime periods
Type
Ambiguous wording
Market type
Binary
  • UMA status: proposed

Probability (last 7 days)

+0.0pp 7d
1007550250
100¢
Jun 28, 2026, 08:00 UTCJul 4, 2026, 16:47 UTC
updated 16:47:30 UTC·src:Polymarket CLOB·snap:snap_2026-07-04T16-47Z

Why did it move?

Structured · 3 factors
  • 01
    Price move

    Up 7pp over 24h

    Now 100¢; +0.3pp in the last hour.

  • 02
    Active signal

    Momentum observation firing

    Probability moved up 7.4pp in 24h with 0.3× liquidity turnover and a tight spread.

  • 03
    Active signal

    Resolution-risk observation firing

    UMA dispute is active — settlement uncertainty, not new directional information.

What to track next

  • Verify the resolution source on this page — exchange feed, official release, news consensus — before treating any move as new information.
  • Wait for the UMA proposal to settle (current status: proposed) — price moves now reflect oracle dynamics, not odds.

Verification actions only — never trade recommendations.

Each factor is grounded in a single named metric you can verify on this page — probability, volume, liquidity, signal, resolution state. No predictions, no prose hallucinations.

Verification Brief

A guided checklist for what must be proven before this market is treated as reliable context.

oracle review
Trust transition

The market is in an oracle/review state where proposal, dispute, and final settlement evidence matter more than the displayed price.

Create trust-state alert

Verification goal

Map resolution-relevant sources to the exact criteria needed to avoid misreading price as settlement.

What needs proof

Primary source

required

Confirm the primary ambiguous wording source and whether it directly answers the market's resolution question.

Current evidence: https://www.fiba.basketball/basketballworldcup/2027/qualifiers

Contract wording

required

Extract the exact condition that makes YES resolve true and note any exclusions, time zone, deadline, or fallback rule.

Settlement state

required

Check whether the market is still live, expired-unresolved, UMA pending, disputed, or officially resolved.

Current evidence: UMA pending

Telegram verification task

Orrery verification task South Sudan vs. Cape Verde State: UMA pending — oracle review Need sources for: 1. Primary source: Confirm the primary ambiguous wording source and whether it directly answers the market's resolution question. 2. Contract wording: Extract the exact condition that makes YES resolve true and note any exclusions, time zone, deadline, or fallback rule. 3. Settlement state: Check whether the market is still live, expired-unresolved, UMA pending, disputed, or officially resolved. Drop only durable links that map to one criterion. Research only. Not trade advice.

X verification thread

Orrery verification brief South Sudan vs. Cape Verde State: oracle review Verify: Primary source + Contract wording Price is not settlement. Research only. Not trade advice.

Market link goes in reply

Guided source review

A controlled loop for durable sources. Every source must answer one criterion from this Verification Brief.

Sources

0

Criteria covered

0

Reviewed

0

Awaiting review

0

Submit a source mapped to a criterion

Confirm the primary ambiguous wording source and whether it directly answers the market's resolution question.

Research only · no price-only screenshots · no profit claims

Recent source checks

Pilot audit summary

Research only · Not trade advice · Every source maps to one criterion

Timeline

critical · price · trade flow

Critical

  • Jul 11, 14:00 UTCScheduled resolution

    Market resolves in 165.2h

    LOW
  • 16:47Signal

    Momentum up

    Probability moved up 7.4pp in 24h with 0.3× liquidity turnover and a tight spread.

    MEDIUM
  • 16:47Signal

    Resolution risk

    UMA dispute is active — settlement uncertainty, not new directional information.

    LOW

Price movement

+7.4pp over the last 24h, now 100¢.

Biggest hourly move: +52.0pp at 16:00 (to 100¢).

Show top 8 of 29 hourly moves
  • 16:00 · +52.0pp → 100¢
  • 15:00 · +44.5pp → 93¢
  • 13:00 · +45.5pp → 95¢
  • 11:00 · +47.0pp → 96¢
  • 06:00 · +45.0pp → 94¢
  • 04:00 · +46.5pp → 95¢
  • 02:00 · +46.0pp → 96¢
  • 21:00 · +44.5pp → 93¢
updated 16:47:30 UTC·src:Polymarket CLOB·Polymarket Data

Active signals

Recent Trades

No recent trades visible from the Data API for this market. That usually means liquidity is thin or this market is between event windows.

updated 16:47:30 UTC·src:Polymarket Data

Market Description

In the upcoming FIBA WCQ Africa game, scheduled for July 4 at 10:00AM ET: If the South Sudan win, the market will resolve to "South Sudan". If the Cape Verde win, the market will resolve to "Cape Verde". If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed. If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50-50. The result will be determined based on the final score including any overtime periods.

Why this category?

confidence: low

Category

Other

Source

Default fallback

Reason

No override, sports marker, rule, or upstream hint matched. Market is unclassified — the keyword rules need an entry for this topic.

Categories come from a deterministic engine: manual overrides (highest priority) → sports hard markers → event-tag rules → keyword rules → Gamma category hint → default. The engine is versioned in category-overrides.ts; methodology lives at /methodology.

FAQ — questions readers actually ask

What is the current Polymarket probability for "South Sudan vs. Cape Verde"?

As of Sat, 04 Jul 2026 16:47:30 GMT, YES is priced at 100% implied probability on Polymarket. The price changed +7.4pp in the last 24 hours, +0.3pp in the last hour, and +0.0pp in the last 7 days.

When does this market resolve?

This market resolves by Jul 11, 2026 (2026-07-11T14:00:00.000Z). Resolution is determined from https://www.fiba.basketball/basketballworldcup/2027/qualifiers.

What source determines the outcome?

Resolution is sourced from https://www.fiba.basketball/basketballworldcup/2027/qualifiers. Polymarket's UMA optimistic oracle is the final settlement layer; if the published source is ambiguous, UMA tokenholders adjudicate. Source-extraction confidence is shown in the Resolution & Risk block above.

How much is being traded on this market?

$22.6K of trading volume in the last 24 hours. Lifetime volume on Polymarket: $25.5K. Open liquidity in the YES/NO orderbooks: $71.0K. Spread between best bid and best ask: 0.1¢.

Is this a trade recommendation?

No. Orrery describes — never predicts. Every signal on this market carries explicit Evidence, Backtest, and Action tiers. The Action is always one of: Watch only, Inspect timeline, Create alert, Verify source, or Ignore — never Buy or Sell. The probability above is the market's collective implied probability, not a forecast Orrery is publishing.

How fresh is this data and where does it come from?

This page revalidates from the public Polymarket APIs every 30 seconds. Probability and 24h-change come from Gamma; the chart series comes from the CLOB orderbook history; trade and holder data come from the Data API. The fetched-at timestamp on each block tells you exactly how old the underlying upstream pull was.

Alerts

¢
Deliver

In-app banners fire as soon as a rule is satisfied. Email digests are wired to a server-side cron and continue while your tabs are closed. Telegram and Discord are planned — every existing rule will keep working as channels light up.