Outrageous-Curtain
0x4301c42edec733d76dac394d39a4847fa8c0fd19
Activity score
57/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
104
Open notional
$0.08
Total PnL
$-1.0K
Realised
$24.73
Win rate
67%
18 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 104- EVIL GENIUSES ACADEMY
Valorant: Evil Geniuses Academy vs Shopify Rebellion Black - Map 2 Winner
91 shares @ 29.7¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 1, 2026$0.05
$-26.95
- FAKE DO BIRU
Counter-Strike: Fake do Biru vs ShindeN (BO3) - ESL Challenger League South America Cup #4 Playoffs
39 shares @ 33.0¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 1, 2026$0.02
$-12.98
- FAZE
Counter-Strike: FaZe vs FURIA - Map 2 Winner
36 shares @ 28.1¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 1, 2026$0.02
$-9.98
- RETHINK
Counter-Strike: NAVI Junior vs ReThink - Map 2 Winner
1000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 29, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- BARÇA ESPORTS
Valorant: DNSTY vs Barça eSports - Map 1 Winner
992 shares @ 1.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 21, 2026$0.00
$-10.67
- BEBOP
Counter-Strike: 1WIN vs Bebop - Map 2 Winner
970 shares @ 1.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 14, 2026$0.00
$-10.22
- VITALITY
Counter-Strike: Vitality vs Team Falcons (BO3) - IEM Rio Group A
970 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 16, 2026$0.00
$-9.91
- NEMIGA
Counter-Strike: Nemiga vs CYBERSHOKE Esports - Map 1 Winner
970 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 26, 2026$0.00
$-0.97
- THE LAST RESORT
Counter-Strike: The Last Resort vs Phantom (BO3) - ESL Challenger League Europe Cup #4 Playoffs
970 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 27, 2026$0.00
$-0.97
- NEMIGA
Counter-Strike: Nemiga vs Eternal Fire - Map 2 Winner
500 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 29, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Fake do Biru vs ShindeN (BO3) - ESL Challenger League South America Cup #4 Playoffs$13.2647m ago
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: FarmVille vs shimmer - Map 2 Winner$2.7348m ago
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: FarmVille vs shimmer - Map 2 Winner$9.9058m ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: FarmVille vs shimmer - Map 2 Winner$25.1959m ago
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: Fake do Biru vs ShindeN - Map 2 Winner$0.271h ago
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: Fake do Biru vs ShindeN - Map 2 Winner$24.741h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Fake do Biru vs ShindeN - Map 2 Winner$23.061h ago
- TRADEBUYValorant: Evil Geniuses Academy vs Shopify Rebellion Black - Map 2 Winner$27.572h ago
- TRADESELLValorant: Evil Geniuses Academy vs Shopify Rebellion Black - Map 2 Winner$22.312h ago
- TRADESELLValorant: Evil Geniuses Academy vs Shopify Rebellion Black (BO3) - VCL North America: Stage 2 Playoffs$5.992h ago
- TRADEBUYValorant: Evil Geniuses Academy vs Shopify Rebellion Black (BO3) - VCL North America: Stage 2 Playoffs$7.112h ago
- TRADESELLValorant: Evil Geniuses Academy vs Shopify Rebellion Black - Map 2 Winner$6.202h ago
- TRADEBUYValorant: Evil Geniuses Academy vs Shopify Rebellion Black - Map 2 Winner$33.222h ago
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: FaZe vs FURIA - Map 2 Winner$33.072h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: FaZe vs FURIA - Map 2 Winner$40.252h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: FaZe vs FURIA - Map 2 Winner$10.222h ago
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: FaZe vs FURIA - Map 1 Winner$50.163h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: FaZe vs FURIA - Map 1 Winner$36.434h ago
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: Passion UA vs FOKUS (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2: Closed Qualifier Playoffs$37.274h ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Passion UA vs FOKUS (BO3) - Stake Ranked Episode 2: Closed Qualifier Playoffs$29.204h ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 49
- Avg trade size
- $29.65
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 1d ago
- Last active
- 47m ago
- Win rate sample
- 18 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".