Map Handicap: URSA (-1.5) vs Brute (+1.5)

• 1

  Down 67pp over 24h

  Now 0¢; flat in the last hour.

• 2

  Light volume — move on a thin book

  Only $10.5k traded against $67.0k of visible liquidity (0.16× turnover). Treat the move as low-confidence until volume confirms.

• 3

  Resolution-risk signal firing

  Expires in 2h with open resolution ambiguity.

• 4

  Expiry in 2h

  Market resolves within 72 hours — the move likely reflects information about the resolution event itself rather than longer-horizon repricing. Verify the resolution source.

• 5

  UMA status: proposed

  An open UMA dispute or pending oracle vote can move price independently of underlying odds. Wait for settlement before treating the line as the market view.

Each factor is grounded in a single named metric you can verify on this page — probability, volume, liquidity, signal, resolution state. No predictions, no prose hallucinations.

No recent trades visible from the Data API for this market.

This market refers to the Counter-Strike match between Ursa and Brute in the CCT Europe Series #1 Play-In Group A, initially scheduled for April 27 at 7:00AM ET. This market will resolve to "Ursa" if Ursa wins 2 or more maps than Brute in this match. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "Brute". Maps won by forfeit, disqualification, walkover, or default are counted towards the handicap, provided that the match is completed. If the match is canceled (not played at all for any reason), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's match forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match ends due to the clinching map being forfeited this will count as a completed match. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://hltv.org. However, if https://hltv.org has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence.