Research Queue · ranked by Research Score
A daily worklist of markets where multiple factors line up. Each row carries a transparent score, confidence context, and a verification next step.
Research candidates
4
Resolution jobs
15
Top score
50
High-confidence
3
Score blends live signal evidence, multi-kind agreement, liquidity, spread quality, and resolution-risk penalty. The action column stays verification-first: watch, alert, verify, compare.
Methodology explanation
Review-only opportunity
No paper intent is emitted from the public opportunity row. Paper action appears only after the paper governor evaluates the row.
Why this market is in review
signalDivergence / timeline check
65% source confidence on this opportunity row.
Paper-only action
paper-onlyReview-only opportunity
read_only_explanation; no live order, no network send, no raw secrets.
Risk / veto readback
reviewConfidence below paper gate
Paper policy needs at least 72% confidence before any paper intent can be proposed.
Source evidence
source4 mapped surfaces
283/283 sources runtime-backed; all registered sources are runtime-backed; live authority remains false.
Signals
- Divergence / timeline checkclear
65% source confidence on this opportunity row.
Veto / blockers
- Confidence below paper gatewatch
Paper policy needs at least 72% confidence before any paper intent can be proposed.
Costs / sizing
- Research score
- Composite opportunity score before paper-governor costs and vetoes.
- Capacity
- Estimated research capacity, not an approved size.
- Liquidity
- Market liquidity visible on the opportunity row.
all registered sources are runtime-backed; live authority remains false; this card cites mapped surfaces only.
Free access
Queue history is a Terminal Pro audit trail
Pro unlocks the current queue. Terminal Pro adds historical snapshots so you can review what entered the queue, why it ranked, and how it changed later.
Honest caveats
- Not a trade signal. The Research Score is a multi-factor ranking for daily research attention, not a forecast. Use the suggested next step — watch, verify, alert, compare — to validate independently.
- Capacity is an estimate. ~8% of visible liquidity. Real capacity depends on the depth of the order book at the moment you place a trade, which this view doesn't see.
- Horizon is a heuristic. Flow + divergence patterns play out in hours; momentum in days. Expiry dominates if closer.
- No execution costs modeled. Spread + Polymarket fees would eat into any nominal advantage if you traded on the score directly — which is why every row carries a verification next-step instead of a trade recommendation.