Research Queue · ranked by Research Score
A daily worklist of markets where multiple factors line up. Each row carries a transparent score, confidence context, and a verification next step.
Research candidates
7
Resolution jobs
15
Top score
60
High-confidence
5
Score blends live signal evidence, multi-kind agreement, liquidity, spread quality, and resolution-risk penalty. The action column stays verification-first: watch, alert, verify, compare.
Methodology explanation
Review-only opportunity
No paper intent is emitted from the public opportunity row. Paper action appears only after the paper governor evaluates the row.
Why this market is in review
signalMomentum / follow-through
95% source confidence on this opportunity row.
Paper-only action
paper-onlyReview-only opportunity
read_only_explanation; no live order, no network send, no raw secrets.
Risk / veto readback
reviewPaper governor not run here
This card explains the opportunity row only; a paper scan is still required before a paper intent or veto exists.
Source evidence
source4 mapped surfaces
283/283 sources runtime-backed; all registered sources are runtime-backed; live authority remains false.
Signals
- Momentum / follow-throughclear
95% source confidence on this opportunity row.
Veto / blockers
- Paper governor not run heresource
This card explains the opportunity row only; a paper scan is still required before a paper intent or veto exists.
Costs / sizing
- Research score
- Composite opportunity score before paper-governor costs and vetoes.
- Capacity
- Estimated research capacity, not an approved size.
- Liquidity
- Market liquidity visible on the opportunity row.
all registered sources are runtime-backed; live authority remains false; this card cites mapped surfaces only.
Free queue preview
Showing top 3 rows on this tab
Research Queue is where the daily terminal becomes a worklist. Pro unlocks the full ranked queue, score context, and alert handoff across research and resolution jobs.
Markets where the active observation is about resolution risk, not a directional movement pattern — verify before treating as research.
- 59
Resolution check · Score 59
Palermo: Tamara Zidansek vs Alevtina IbragimovaSportsLIVE1 signalStatus: LIVEScore conf.: HIGHExpiry: Jul 27, 09:00 UTCUMA: — - 59
Resolution check · Score 59
Palermo: Miriam Bulgaru vs Caijsa HennemannSportsLIVE1 signalStatus: LIVEScore conf.: HIGHExpiry: Jul 27, 09:00 UTCUMA: — - 65
Resolution check · Score 65
Will Oleksandr Syrskyi be out as Ukraine's Commander-in-Chief by July 31, 2026?GeopoliticsPINNED YES1 signalStatus: RAIL_PINNED_YESScore conf.: HIGHExpiry: Jul 31, 23:59 UTCUMA: —
Palermo: Tamara Zidansek vs Alevtina Ibragimova
SportsRisk
Low
Score
59
Confidence
Divergence / timeline check
83% source confidence on this opportunity row.
Paper governor not run here
This card explains the opportunity row only; a paper scan is still required before a paper intent or veto exists.
Palermo: Miriam Bulgaru vs Caijsa Hennemann
SportsRisk
Low
Score
59
Confidence
Momentum / follow-through
79% source confidence on this opportunity row.
Paper governor not run here
This card explains the opportunity row only; a paper scan is still required before a paper intent or veto exists.
Will Oleksandr Syrskyi be out as Ukraine's Commander-in-Chief by July 31, 2026?
GeopoliticsRisk
Medium
Score
65
Confidence
Momentum / follow-through
95% source confidence on this opportunity row.
Paper governor not run here
This card explains the opportunity row only; a paper scan is still required before a paper intent or veto exists.
Honest caveats
- Not a trade signal. The Research Score is a multi-factor ranking for daily research attention, not a forecast. Use the suggested next step — watch, verify, alert, compare — to validate independently.
- Capacity is an estimate. ~8% of visible liquidity. Real capacity depends on the depth of the order book at the moment you place a trade, which this view doesn't see.
- Horizon is a heuristic. Flow + divergence patterns play out in hours; momentum in days. Expiry dominates if closer.
- No execution costs modeled. Spread + Polymarket fees would eat into any nominal advantage if you traded on the score directly — which is why every row carries a verification next-step instead of a trade recommendation.