Scratchy-Familiar
0x4fc4c8c3c5d026d889cb96ba134aa943c504e114
Wallet digest
Activity score
75/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
75
Open notional
$1.1K
Total PnL
$-844.17
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 75- YES
Will France win Group I in the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
453 shares @ 69.4¢·now 69.5¢·exp Jun 27, 2026$314.59
$0.20
- YES
Will Belgium win Group G in the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
383 shares @ 71.8¢·now 66.5¢·exp Jun 27, 2026$254.65
$-20.38
- YES
Will France win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
1031 shares @ 14.5¢·now 18.1¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$187.07
$37.07
- YES
Will England win Group L in the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
180 shares @ 73.0¢·now 72.5¢·exp Jun 27, 2026$130.60
$-0.90
- YES
Will Spain win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
705 shares @ 15.6¢·now 16.7¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$117.40
$7.40
- YES
Will Switzerland win Group B in the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
140 shares @ 53.7¢·now 54.5¢·exp Jun 27, 2026$76.56
$1.06
- YES
Will England win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
202 shares @ 11.4¢·now 11.3¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$22.90
$-0.10
- YES
Will Argentina win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
202 shares @ 9.0¢·now 8.3¢·exp Jul 20, 2026$16.89
$-1.31
- YES
Will Arsenal FC win on 2026-04-11?
90 shares @ 68.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 11, 2026$0.00
$-61.79
- YES
Will Everton FC win on 2026-05-17?
46 shares @ 60.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$0.00
$-27.90
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Belgium win Group G in the 2026 FIFA World Cup?$69.34May 18, 03:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Belgium win Group G in the 2026 FIFA World Cup?$27.93May 18, 03:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Belgium win Group G in the 2026 FIFA World Cup?$13.33May 18, 03:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Belgium win Group G in the 2026 FIFA World Cup?$13.14May 18, 03:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill France win Group I in the 2026 FIFA World Cup?$142.67May 18, 03:14 UTC
- YIELD$0.04May 18, 00:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Metz win on 2026-05-17?$2.16May 17, 20:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill OGC Nice win on 2026-05-17?$23.17May 17, 18:52 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Brentford FC vs. Crystal Palace FC end in a draw?$16.64May 17, 16:29 UTC
- REDEEMWill AS Roma win on 2026-05-17?$25.31May 17, 16:24 UTC
- REDEEMWill SSC Napoli win on 2026-05-17?$30.28May 17, 16:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Brentford FC vs. Crystal Palace FC end in a draw?$5.10May 17, 15:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Everton FC win on 2026-05-17?$5.61May 17, 15:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Everton FC win on 2026-05-17?$22.57May 17, 15:18 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Manchester United FC win on 2026-05-17?$20.24May 17, 15:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Internazionale Milano win on 2026-05-17?$21.98May 17, 12:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill ACF Fiorentina win on 2026-05-17?$18.19May 17, 11:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Olympique Lyonnais win on 2026-05-17?$11.72May 17, 02:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Juventus FC win on 2026-05-17?$22.57May 17, 02:01 UTC
- REDEEMWill Manchester City FC win on 2026-05-16?$45.70May 17, 01:40 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 35
- Avg trade size
- $25.16
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 7, 22:25 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 03:25 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".