Map Handicap: MISA (-1.5) vs CYBERSHOKE Prospects (+1.5)

• 1

  Resolution-risk signal firing

  Market has reached expiry. Watch the UMA dispute window.

• 2

  Thin liquidity

  Only $1.7k of visible book — small orders can move the line. Treat the probability as a soft estimate.

• 3

  Past expiry — awaiting resolution

  Market is past its end date. Any price move now is a settlement / dispute artefact, not new information.

• 4

  UMA status: proposed

  An open UMA dispute or pending oracle vote can move price independently of underlying odds. Wait for settlement before treating the line as the market view.

Each factor is grounded in a single named metric you can verify on this page — probability, volume, liquidity, signal, resolution state. No predictions, no prose hallucinations.

No recent trades visible from the Data API for this market.

This market refers to the Counter-Strike Lower bracket round 3 match between CYBERSHOKE Prospects and Misa Esports in the ESL Challenger League Europe Cup #4 Playoffs, initially scheduled for April 26 at 1:00PM ET. This market will resolve to "Misa Esports" if Misa Esports wins 2 or more maps than CYBERSHOKE Prospects in this match. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "CYBERSHOKE Prospects". Maps won by forfeit, disqualification, walkover, or default are counted towards the handicap, provided that the match is completed. If the match is canceled (not played at all for any reason), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's match forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match ends due to the clinching map being forfeited this will count as a completed match. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://hltv.org. However, if https://hltv.org has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence.