Will Donald Trump publicly insult someone on May 1, 2026?
Probability
100¢
1h
+0.3pp
24h
+12.3pp
24h Vol
$19.6K
Liquidity
$8.4K
Resolution & Risk
MEDIUM risk- End date
- May 31, 2026
- UMA status
- proposed
- Resolution source
- Primaryconsensus of credible reportingTypeNews consensusConfidenceextracted · medium
- Market type
- Binary
- UMA status: proposed
Probability (last 7 days)
+0.0pp 7dWhy did it move?
Structured · 4 factors- 01Price move
Up 12pp over 24h
Now 100¢; +0.3pp in the last hour.
- 02Volume pressure
Heavy volume on this book — 2.3× turnover
$19.6k traded against $8.4k of visible liquidity. The book is being worked, not just quoted.
- 03Active signal
Resolution-risk signal firing
UMA dispute is active — settlement uncertainty, not new directional information.
- 04Liquidity
Thin liquidity
Only $8.4k of visible book — small orders can move the line. Treat the probability as a soft estimate.
What to track next
- Verify the resolution source on this page — exchange feed, official release, news consensus — before treating any move as new information.
- Wait for the UMA proposal to settle (current status: proposed) — price moves now reflect oracle dynamics, not odds.
Verification actions only — never trade recommendations.
Each factor is grounded in a single named metric you can verify on this page — probability, volume, liquidity, signal, resolution state. No predictions, no prose hallucinations.
Resolution & Risk
MEDIUM risk- End date
- May 31, 2026
- UMA status
- proposed
- Resolution source
- Primaryconsensus of credible reportingTypeNews consensusConfidenceextracted · medium
- Market type
- Binary
- UMA status: proposed
Timeline
critical · price · trade flowCritical
- 0s agoResolveLOW
Market resolves in 701.7h
- 18:18SignalLOW
Resolution risk
UMA dispute is active — settlement uncertainty, not new directional information.
Price movement
+12.3pp over the last 24h, now 100¢.
Active signals
Recent Trades
No recent trades visible from the Data API for this market. That usually means liquidity is thin or this market is between event windows.
Related Markets
14- 89¢+2.5
Will Donald Trump publicly insult someone on May 8, 2026?
Politics · Vol $65.30
- 89¢+10.5
Will Donald Trump publicly insult someone on May 10, 2026?
Politics · Vol $28.47
- 89¢+8.5
Will Donald Trump publicly insult someone on May 12, 2026?
Politics · Vol $25.17
- 90¢+11.0
Will Donald Trump publicly insult someone on May 14, 2026?
Politics · Vol $26.22
- 89¢+39.0
Will Donald Trump publicly insult someone on May 16, 2026?
Politics · Vol $11.58
- 89¢+39.5
Will Donald Trump publicly insult someone on May 18, 2026?
Politics · Vol $12.81
- 86¢+35.5
Will Donald Trump publicly insult someone on May 20, 2026?
Politics · Vol $6.25
- 86¢+36.5
Will Donald Trump publicly insult someone on May 22, 2026?
Politics · Vol $6.32
- 100¢+0.2
Will Trump talk to Ursula von der Leyen in April?
Politics · Vol $416.1K
- 2¢-1.4
Trump out as President by June 30?
Politics · Vol $409.3K
- 1¢0.0
Will Zohran Mamdani win the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination?
Politics · Vol $197.2K
- 1¢0.0
Will Pete Hegseth win the 2028 Republican presidential nomination?
Politics · Vol $127.3K
- 1¢0.0
Will Chris Murphy win the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination?
Politics · Vol $125.3K
- 1¢0.0
Will Eric Trump win the 2028 Republican presidential nomination?
Politics · Vol $111.0K
Market Description
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults, mocks, or attacks any non-fictional individual personally or professionally in a clearly negative manner on the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". This includes calling the individual weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure, using an insulting nickname, using other derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a derogatory personal way (e.g., “He/She isn’t smart”). Negative forms used in reference to the individual's professional actions, policies, or decisions (e.g., “He/She isn’t being smart about this policy”) will not count. Policy disagreements stated without disparaging language will not count. A direct reference will qualify even if the individual is not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject. Any written, verbal, or recorded public statement by Trump qualifies. The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
Alerts
In-app banners fire as soon as a rule is satisfied. Email, Telegram, and Discord delivery are coming soon — every existing rule will keep working without changes.
Top Holders
20 wallets- Immense-Patriot4.1K
- 0xee67…67a61.2K
- 0x61b5…5714940
- Incomparable-Surprise709
- Poor-Raid567