Map Handicap: RT (-1.5) vs KUUSAMO.gg (+1.5)

1. 1

   Resolution-risk signal firing

   Expires in 3h with open resolution ambiguity.

2. 2

   Thin liquidity

   Only $15.1k of visible book — small orders can move the line. Treat the probability as a soft estimate.

3. 3

   Expiry in 3h

   Market resolves within 72 hours — the move likely reflects information about the resolution event itself rather than longer-horizon repricing. Verify the resolution source.

Each factor is grounded in a single named metric you can verify on this page — probability, volume, liquidity, signal, resolution state. No predictions, no prose hallucinations.

Prose narration of the same metrics shown in the structured breakdown above. Cites only the market data on this page — no news, no predictions. Use the structured factors as the canonical answer; this is here for readability.

No recent trades visible from the Data API for this market.

This market refers to the Counter-Strike Decider match between ReThink and KUUSAMO.gg in the European Pro League Regular Group D, initially scheduled for April 25 at 6:30AM ET. This market will resolve to "ReThink" if ReThink wins 2 or more maps than KUUSAMO.gg in this match. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "KUUSAMO.gg". Maps won by forfeit, disqualification, walkover, or default are counted towards the handicap, provided that the match is completed. If the match is canceled (not played at all for any reason), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's match forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match ends due to the clinching map being forfeited this will count as a completed match. The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://hltv.org. However, if https://hltv.org has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence.